header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~

 (Read 167226 times)

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8821
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1414 on: March 11, 2018, 04:25:29 PM »
Credit to Sampson, he might’ve been sketchy in he past, but he’s built the Cougars into a pretty damn good team. 

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11774
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1415 on: March 11, 2018, 05:36:52 PM »

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22156
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1416 on: March 11, 2018, 06:45:45 PM »
I guess putting Syracuse in is easier than listening to Boeheim whine.

MaximumSam

  • Guest
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1417 on: March 11, 2018, 08:20:36 PM »
Buckeyes get a tough draw going out west in the 5/12 death matchup and then potentially facing 4 seed Gonzaga (#8 overall on KenPom). If they get through that, though, could get a pretty fun duel with Xavier.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22156
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1418 on: March 11, 2018, 09:37:21 PM »
Buckeyes get a tough draw going out west in the 5/12 death matchup and then potentially facing 4 seed Gonzaga (#8 overall on KenPom). If they get through that, though, could get a pretty fun duel with Xavier.
Yeah, that's really rough.
MSU can't beat Duke, so that's as far as I'm taking them, but aside from that I can't complain, aside from MSU being a 2 seed by basically every metric except RPI.  I think Kansas is the weakest 1, and I struggle to buy into Auburn.

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22156
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1419 on: March 11, 2018, 10:53:15 PM »
How the hell does a 19-13 Big Ten team not even make the NIT?

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1994
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1420 on: March 12, 2018, 12:04:27 AM »
How the hell does a 19-13 Big Ten team not even make the NIT?
Maryland? Wasn't there an abundance of Regular season champs that filled those at large spots?

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5912
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1421 on: March 12, 2018, 12:22:23 AM »
Nebraska fans sour about not hosting (NIT).   I'll admit, I truly do not care.   I am a total cliff's notes college basketball fan (as I age).  I'm glad to see Marquette taking their home game at the 'AL'  (an on campus gym where the women hoops and vball teams play). I assume they had no choice with a  likely Bradley Center conflict.

Trivial of course, but I have to think the NIT scheduling logistics are quite a challenge for whomever.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 29738
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1422 on: March 12, 2018, 07:46:42 AM »
How the hell does a 19-13 Big Ten team not even make the NIT?
The selection committee forgot about them. It's hard to remember teams that don't play for over a week.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22156
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1423 on: March 12, 2018, 08:28:29 AM »
Maryland? Wasn't there an abundance of Regular season champs that filled those at large spots?
There were 12.
10 last year, 15 in 2016, 12 in 2015, 13 in 2014.
So it seems about average

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11774
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1424 on: March 12, 2018, 08:59:30 AM »
Maybe the NIT has a wink-nod agreement with the CBA/CIT/etc to pass on all but a token Big Ten team, since they routinely big time the smaller tourneys. 

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22156
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1425 on: March 12, 2018, 09:05:38 AM »
Maybe the NIT has a wink-nod agreement with the CBA/CIT/etc to pass on all but a token Big Ten team, since they routinely big time the smaller tourneys.
I don't think any P5 conferences accept CIT/CBI invites

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 29738
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1426 on: March 12, 2018, 10:05:03 AM »
Didn't Illinois play in one of those things recently?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22156
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1427 on: March 12, 2018, 10:54:02 AM »
Didn't Illinois play in one of those things recently?
As far as I can tell, Colorado in 2015 is the only P5 school to play in either in the last 3 years.

EDIT: PSU, Oregon State and Texas A&M played in the CBI 4 years ago; Purdue and Texas did in 2013; Oregon State, Washington State and Pitt in 2012.

So it seems like until 2014, there were like 2 or 3 of the 16 in the CBS that were P5 schools (although never Illinois), but since then, it stopped.  The CIT is only for mid-majors I believe
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 10:57:25 AM by ELA »

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.