Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

This exercise is silly. More intersting would be someone who was good with bad receivers and tailbacks. Find me those guys.

That's someone like Drew Brees. 

Top receivers in 2000, his Rose Bowl year:




Top rushers in 2000:




Of those receivers, I think Vinny sniffed the NFL as a kick returner for a little while, and Stratton was pretty good (won the TE award that year). 

What really helped Brees, of course, was his OL. He actually had a legit OL blocking for him. 

But I'd say he's a good example of a QB who elevated the team around him, rather than someone who just managed to not wrap his Ferrari around a tree. 

This is OT, but I don't care - what was the difference between Chris Perry and Mike Hart?  In my mind, without checking, they were both 3 or 4-year starters who were productive and relatively slow.  But they got you those 4 yards every carry and UM rode them into the ground.  What distinguishes them?

Chris Perry was a 6’+, 230 pounds who ran legitimately in the 4.5’s. Perry was a bruising power back who had the ability to hit the home run as well. 

Mike Hart was 5’8, 190 pounds soaking wet, ran 4.75 on a good day. He was extremely tough for his size, but he couldn’t bully defenders the way Perry did at times, and Hart didn’t have the home run speed. Perry could hit that top gear and break a 50 or 60 yard TD. Hart just couldn’t do that- he was quick in a phone booth but his top end speed was terrible. He’d get caught from behind all the time. If he had that home run speed he’d have been a college all time great- not just a Michigan all-time great. 

I think assigning credit on a football team is still in the stone ages. 
Like for a QB, how much does a great RB affect his production?  Or a good WR?  A good OL? 
.
Good point about '83 UNL.

81, 82, 83 UNL

only one great WR, but everywhere else the offense was loaded

But I'd argue that list is chopped liver, considering the records of the teams they led.  Aside from McCarron's last 2 years, Tua, and Jones this year, those others were certainly the weakest links of their teams.  
.
It's a tribute to Saban and the roster as a whole to be having this convo.  And I just picked recent Bama because they're fresh in all our minds.  
An easy way to see if Saban trusts his QB is by how many passing TDs he gets - trusting the QB to not turn the ball over in the red zone.  McCarron wasn't appreciably better in '12 or '13, but Saban trusted him a lot more (half as many passing TD in '11).  This all assumes that Bama has 1-2 NFL RBs that can safely punch it in behind a great OL.

Sure, it's why he transferred - his limited passing ability.
.
Hurts is a case where he saddled the most responsibility in an environment that would have been more productive for him to be a quality distributor.  Sort of like he played point guard like Allen Iverson, despite having Larry Bird camped out at the 3-point line and James Worthy slashing towards the hoop.  He's taking too many shots in that situation.
.
Hurts was a poorer passer than both is predecessor and successor.  He was a good runner for a QB, but his yards per carry was worse than his RBs.  Now, that's usually true because sacks are counted in, but still.  In '16, his RBs averaged almost 2 yards per carry more than he did.  So having a good running QB is an additional attribute can be a good thing, it isn't if he's less productive than the alternative*. 
To his credit, he did improve as a passer in '17, but was night-and-day from being as good as Tua.
.
Again, this discussion isn't to talk badly about anyone.  Hurts started at QB for great Alabama teams and was a good player.  But he was surrounded by elite talent.  The more of the load he shouldered, I fear it was at the expense of more production by his teammates.
.
.
.
*if your mind invariably jumps to Tebow, he was Florida's designated 3rd & 1, 4th & 1, and goal-to-go ball carrier.  This is evidenced by the rushing TDs, you can look up yourself

Jay Barker improved a ton from '92-'94.  And he probably had the worst passing stats for a national champion (non-option QB) ever.  Good call.
They had to get David Palmer to take snaps in key situations to video game (ie - manufacture) first downs and touchdowns at some points.  

Hmm, maybe name a QB who has gotten a lot of playing time that wouldn't have led Bama to NCs (or close) given those teammates?  How bad would a QB have to be to wreck those years?

.

And listing Hurts' accolades is sort of why I started this thread.  He got a lot of credit for his driving well in a Ferrari.