So I wasted about 20 min trying to set up a system (groan) to rank general game outcomes. Logical stuff like a win is better than a loss, a blowout win is better than a close win, and a win over a good team is better than a win over a bad team.
Logical, right?
So the data involved are:
Win or Loss
Power5 or Group5
MOV - by 3+ possessions, by 2 possessions, or a 1 possession game
SOS -
2*...Was the opponent at .500 or a game above or below .500?
3*...Were they 2+ games over .500?
1*...Were they 2+ games below .500 (in conference games, to even out the scheduling disparity some)
So basically how did you do, against whom, by how much did you win or lose, and how good was your opponent?
The top and bottom of this system are super simple.
The top/best:
Win vs a 3* P5 team by 3 or more possessions
Win vs a 3* P5 team by 2 possessions
Win vs a 3* P5 team by 1 possession
-------------------------
Win vs a 2* P5 team by 3 or more possessions
Win vs a 2* P5 team by 2 possessions
Win vs a 2* P5 team by 1 possession
--------------------------
Okay, and the bottom, worst listed last:
Loss vs 2* G5 team by 1 poss.
Loss vs 2* G5 team by 2 poss.
Loss vs 2* G5 team by 3+ poss.
----------------------
Loss vs 1* G5 team by 1 poss.
Loss vs 1* G5 team by 2 poss.
Loss vs 1* G5 team by 3+ poss.
So that leaves a big middle, right? I intertwined wins vs bad P5 teams and good G5 teams, then wins vs bad G5. And the opposite as well - losses vs bad P5 teams and good G5 teams are better than losses vs bad G5 teams. Logical, still.
I'll list the entire hierarchy, then slide in the OU and OSU schedules and see what we get. Yes, I'm a nerd.