Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

I've yet to see anything from Florida to make me think they have a good defense (or a good team).  They haven't seen a game where they've given up less than 20.  MSU, at this point, is a superior team to Florida, though UF did show a little offense against Vanderbilt, for whatever that's worth.

Bet you Florida has more guys on that defensive 2 deep drafted by the NFL than MSU.

If they have to rely on O'Korn, it could be a long day.

Definitely agree there. The Michigan offense isn't built to rely on the QB. But I'd rather rely on O'Korn than Speight. O'Korn had really high ups and really low downs and his struggles at Houston- but he has one thing Speight does not- talent. Give me talent over no talent everyday and twice on Saturday. It'd be one thing if Speight was just a game manager and not turning the ball over. You look at him and he's a turnover machine. Not just turning it over-but he was making back breaking cost your teams the game turnovers.

O'Korn has throws in his wheelhouse that Speight couldn't make if his life depended on it.

 O'Korn has throws in his wheelhouse that Speight couldn't make if his life depended on it.

If O'Korn can keep his collective ka-ka together for at least a season you may have something.He could look like a Heisman candidate one play and make you hurl the next.Consistency!Spreight could have cost M a game.Wonder if he'd still be under center sans the injury

O'Korn has throws in his wheelhouse that Speight couldn't make if his life depended on it.

I hope you are right.  O'Korn throws better on the move so that's a plus given what we've seen from Michigan's OL. Speight throws a better deep ball when he has the time which was rarely this year.  I'd expect to see O'Korn in the shotgun most of the day.  And the OL better protect him and Peters better be ready to play.  Sparty has not forgotten Michigan breaking Lewerke's leg last year.  

Also, the mental problems with the OL will get worked out eventually. Michigan has lots of talented O linemen that just need more time and experience.  I knew all the "addition by subtraction" talk in the off season was BS.

If O'Korn can keep his collective ka-ka together for at least a season you may have something.He could look like a Heisman candidate one play and make you hurl the next.Consistency!Spreight could have cost M a game.Wonder if he'd still be under center sans the injury

When O'Korn was on point he was excellent at Houston. A real play-maker. When the wheels came off and he lost his confidence and went in the tank- he was like all-time bad. He definitely has talent, but man he was a Dr. Jekyl and Mr Hyde creature. Which obviously you don't want that if you're Harbaugh- which makes sense why he probably went with Speight- who he felt was the "safer" of the two- the better game manager. And Speight was OK. Until the Iowa game. During and since that game he has been really bad. Not just bad- but all-time bad and just a real turnover machine. Might as well go with O'Korn if that's what you're going to get out of Speight. Speight has been horrible. High, behind, or wide on all his throws, he's thrown like four or five pick 6's since the Ohio State game- he's thrown more INT's than TD's since the Iowa game- his completion percentage has been horrible- he holds onto the ball too long and can't read defenses quick enough. There really was no reason to keep playing him after that Florida game. I don't know why they did.

@kylebaustin
Since 2008, MSU's against the spread record vs. Michigan: 9-0
ATS record vs. everyone else: 53-57-3

That + a spread that feels heavy for Michigan makes it feel like a no-brainer bet for the dog. But most times I think there is a no brainer bet I end up empty handed.

I saw it moved from like 14 to 10.5.
I thought Michigan was going to take out 8 years of frustrations last year, and they really didn't.
Night game though, I don't know.  I think MSU sticks around for a half with both offenses struggling to get any traction, but Michigan moves it a little, and MSU has too many 3rd and longs leading to quick 3 and outs or bad turnovers, and UM pulls away in the 2nd half.  I think the Wolverines cover.

Your thoughts above more or less mirrored the Purdue game for Michigan. My fear is the Spartan defense is heads and tails better than Purdue. 
I would guess a very close game for at least a half and first one to 20 wins. I suppose it could end up with a cover and be a 24-13 type game, but still feel close throughout. I just don't see Michigan putting up too many points against the Spartan defense, unless they get a score or two that come in unconventional ways (defense, special teams, etc.)