I assume there is both- those who start with nearly insurmountable obstacles who are able to find a way, and those who want to, try extremely hard, but the obstacles are just too much.
I think it is naive to not think that there are many people who are very successful, but wouldn’t have been had they faced those obstacles. Likewise- I think it is naive to not think there are many who struggle badly, who wouldn’t if they had more readily available opportunities. As Drew said- to some degree or in some way, it has always been that way.
Too me the real questions ( the ones we all fight over) are:
-what can be done realistically to remove those obstacles and create opportunities?
And
How much can be taken ( involuntarily) from those who are successful to be given to those who are not or not yet? The redistribution of wealth problem.
I emphasize the word “ involuntarily” because a connecting and very impacting side effect is this:
Much of the resource today that goes to help feed, educate, provide for and mentor those with low income, comes from private sector people and businesses (like 847 AND his business).
If you tax them more- their ability to make those contributions is greatly reduced. That is a reality.
That’s is the debate.