I am pondering, without any conclusion, how much the recent woes of ND, Texas, and USC - and perhaps Michigan and Penn State and Nebraska - have diluted their helmetosity.
Would our view of FSU and Miami be/have been different in 2000?
USC is still a helmet kind of team even if they have been "quiet" until last season, out of sight out of mind.
Notre Dame was 4-8 last year. It's back to the debate about how much and how fast a team can move up or down.
i'll go on record again as saying helmet status can be attained (and lost) relatively quickly. but once attained and
sustained for a long period of time, it likewise takes a long time to lose.
basically, there is reciprocity in how long you've had helmet status with how fast you can lose it. but it's faster down hill. so, say 1 to .5 ratio. 10 years to gain, 5 to lose it. 1 year gain, half to lose it. 50 years gained, 25 to lose it.
helmet status defined as ability to get benefit of the doubt in rankings.
examples of each:
quick risers and fallers (1-10 years gained, will dissipate just as quickly): oregon, boise
middle road (10-30 years gained, likewise couple decades to lose): fsu, miami
long time (30+ years gained, long time to lose): nd, neb