Yeah, it's just conventionalized. Bwarbs explained why, given the correct perspective, the convention makes sense, but the main code is both about the word used and how many times.
Neutral versus "home and home" is pretty obvious. Then there are pay-for-home games. Those are (perhaps) always scheduled as one-offs. We could call each a "home" series, but one event isn't a series, and this is never going to catch on. Still, it bears noticing that only "home and home" acknowledges two games, because (practically speaking) only series on each team's home turf are scheduled in increments greater than one. And that makes this home/away distinction nonsense. Doesn't matter. Identical info is there whether you call them home-and-homes, home-and-aways, or (Ick.) away-and-aways.